Author Archives: sd6248

DOJ Announces Policy Ending “Regulation by Prosecution” of Digital Assets

by Joel Cohen, Brent Wible, Ladan Stewart, Marietou Diouf, Robert Denault, and Elisha Mvundura 

Photos of the authors

Top left to right: Joel Cohen, Brent Wible and Ladan Stewart, Bottom left to right: Marietou Diouf, Robert Denault and Elisha Mvundura (Photos courtesy of White & Case LLP).

On April 7, 2025, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a memorandum instructing federal prosecutors to cease pursuing “litigation or enforcement actions that have the effect of superimposing regulatory frameworks on digital assets,” noting that regulators and not prosecutors will “do this work outside the punitive criminal justice framework.”[1]  Under the new policy, the Justice Department will prioritize investigations and prosecutions involving individuals who defraud investors in digital assets or who use digital assets in furtherance of other crimes, including offenses related to terrorism, narcotics trafficking, human trafficking, organized crime, hacking, and cartel and gang financing.  The memorandum indicates that the Justice Department plans to close all ongoing investigations that are inconsistent with the new policy.

Continue reading →

SEC Now Requires Commission Approval for Subpoenas, but Says It Is Not ‘Walking Away’ From Enforcement

by Andrew Goldstein, Elizabeth Skey, and Bingxin Wu

Photos of the authors

Left to right: Andrew Goldstein, Elizabeth Skey and Bingxin Wu (photos courtesy of Cooley LLP)

On March 10, 2025, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted a final rule that will require a majority of the commissioners to agree before the SEC formally opens an investigation. For the past 15 years, that power had been delegated to the SEC’s director of enforcement – enabling SEC staff attorneys to issue subpoenas to companies and individuals without approval of the commission. The new rule will make it more difficult for staff to gain subpoena power, adding a bureaucratic hurdle that could slow investigations down. At the same time, however, Acting Deputy Director of the Division of Enforcement Antonia Apps has insisted publicly that the SEC is not “walking away” from enforcement, but will focus on core areas, such as fraud and deceptive market practices.

Continue reading →

End of the Road: Fincen Adopts Interim Final Rule Virtually Eliminating CTA Filing Requirements

by Matthew Bisanz, Brad A. Resnikoff, Kristin E. Rice-Gonzalez, Marcella Barganz, Courtney C. Seitz, Lorenz A. Taets, and Kelly F. Truesdale

photos of the authors

Top left to right: Matthew Bisanz, Brad A. Resnikoff, Kristin E. Rice-Gonzalez, Marcella Barganz, Bottom left to right: Courtney C. Seitz, Lorenz A. Taets and Kelly F. Truesdale (Photos courtesy of Mayer Brown)

March 21, 2025, the US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) issued an interim final rule (the “IFR”) that exempts all domestic entities from beneficial ownership information reporting requirements under the Corporate Transparency Act (the “CTA”) and its implementing regulations (the “Reporting Rule”). These changes have the effect of eliminating any reporting requirement for more than 99.9% of the entities that were previously required to report[1] and, for domestic entities and US person beneficial owners, marking the end of the yearslong journey towards the CTAs reporting requirements, which were enacted into law in early 2021 and implemented by FinCEN’s original rulemaking  in September 2022.

Continue reading →

CPPA Fines Honda $632,500 for CCPA Violations

by Jenna N. Rode

Photo courtesy of the author

On March 12, 2025, the California Privacy Protection Agency (“CPPA”) announced that it reached a settlement with American Honda Motor Co. (“Honda”) in which Honda will pay a $632,500 fine to resolve claims that the company violated the CCPA. The enforcement action comes as part of the CPPA’s ongoing investigation into connected vehicle manufacturers, which began in 2023.

Continue reading →

UK, French, and Swiss Enforcement Authorities Announce New Alliance

by Lloyd Firth, Dr. Jan-S. Wendler, Claire M. Guehenno, Kimberly A. Parker, Jay Holtmeier, Erin G.H. Sloane, Christopher Cestaro, and Lindsey Cullen

Top left to right: Lloyd Firth, Dr. Jan-S. Wendler, Claire M. Guehenno and Kimberly A. Parker. Bottom left to right: Jay Holtmeier, Erin G.H. Sloane, Christopher Cestaro and Lindsey Cullen (Photos courtesy of WilmerHale).

Summary

Anti-bribery and corruption agencies in the UK, France and Switzerland recently announced a shared commitment to tackling international bribery and corruption, by way of a new taskforce intended to strengthen collaboration.

This taskforce was announced by the UK’s Serious Fraud Office (SFO), France’s Parquet National Financier (PNF) and the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland (OAG) at a meeting in London. Its founding statement notes “the significant threat of bribery and corruption” and states that its members recognise that “success relies on us working closely and effectively together”. It intends to deliver a working group for case cooperation and increased best practice sharing.

Continue reading →

Explaining Credit Scores – The ECJ Rules on Automated Credit Assessments

by Katja Langenbucher and Kevin Bauer

Photos of the authors

Left to right: Katja Langenbucher and Kevin Bauer (photos courtesy of authors)

A little over a year ago, the SCHUFA tightened the requirements for credit scoring under the EU GDPR. On February 27, the Court handed down further instructions on providing scored consumers with “meaningful information about the logic involved” as required by Art. 15(1)(h) of the GDPR.

Continue reading →